The "Uber-Pitch": Opportunities Beyond the Driver's Seat

Step aside elevator pitches and make way for the "Uber-pitch". Not only are Uber and Lyft drivers finding great careers from being drivers; professionals with day jobs are moonlighting as shared car service drivers to increase their earning potential—and not through the tips they get from passengers, but in their professional careers!

Carless city-dwellers, alcoholics, and those who simply prefer not to drive, tout that the benefits of ride-sharing outweigh that of the traditional cab: drivers get rated so they tend not to drive like maniacs, their cars don’t smell of three-day-old takeout (or worse), and usually they greet you with a smile and ask if you have a preferred route. But aside from the obvious utilitarian purpose of getting passengers from point a to point b, ride sharing has another intrinsic function –- connecting people long enough to hear what they do, and/or what they're interested in. Ride sharing translates to some into a mini, in-person, job screening, or for others, an elevator pitch.

Opportunistic drivers are using these chance meetups to enhance their “real-world” occupation. Just the other night, I caught a ride to the airport with a mortgage broker who was hoping to supplement his income, not just by Uber-driving-- but by connecting with potential mortgage seekers who need a ride. Another friend of his, a real-estate broker, closed four deals (four deals!!!!) in the past two weeks, all which started off in her ride sharing vehicle.  Just think, if they’re motivated enough to work a second job to get leads, they either really suck at business development, or probably know other insider industry knowledge too.

Conversely, the Lyft driver who picked me up when I landed informed me that he often receives referrals for jobs. He even scored a job interview at Ebay a few weeks ago.

Despite their ads on Facebook, I haven’t met one ride sharing driver who has struck it rich in Uber/Lyft-land. However, these clandestine moments between driver and passenger have the potential to be a better networking opportunity than most happy hours. You get direct, casual, one-on-one time with the other person (way more than what most recruiters get) while in transit. Who knows what this could lead to if you've mastered the art of the "Uber pitch”. Viable business opportunity awaits on both sides of the driver's seat if the connection is right.

Furthermore, savvy drivers can work location to their advantage too. Looking for funding for your start-up? Consistently pick up passengers around Sandhilll road (i.e. Nor-Cal's venture capitalist central) and someone is bound to ask you what you do. Want to get a feel for the work culture of a particular industry? Tailor your route so that it hits the places where the major players work, dine, or hang out at (and see how bad the traffic is too). Opportunities extend well beyond the driver's seat in the ride sharing community.

The Facebook Family Photo Legacy

Over the past week, two friends of mine gave birth (congrats again!) And within 48 hours of said births, they posted pics of the newborn babies online. This is great because otherwise I would have to wait until the next time I'm in So-Cal to see their precious little faces. However, I'm curious about the effect this social media family photo legacy will have on the kids of Generation Y (and Z?)

How are kids going to feel about being exhibited by their parents online (because they were just so cute) when they were taking a bubble bath at age two? I know, at thirty, I feel nostalgia for the pictures my mom still has hanging up in her house from my youth. But there was definitely a period of my life, let's say from tween to 20 where I absolutely hated them. I would avoid walking potential boyfriends down that hallway because I did NOT want them to see me at age eight with chickenpox or during my "fat" pre-teen phase.

What does the future hold for this next generation of kids who grow up "on" social media? Will Facebook simply become outdated and have to be dug up like an old family album in order to unlock its awkward pictorial secrets? Or will proud parents keep posting to Facebook even when their kids have their own accounts? I can see it now: moms and dads lovingly tagging their kids in "funny" family vacation photos while their too-cool-for-school/emo/goth/indie tweens furiously untag themselves, because "NO ONE can see those HIDEOUS pictures mom!"

On one hand, I feel bad for kids these days because there are so many inherent avenues to breed insecurity (and bullying) in our digital culture. But on the other hand, it's kind of nice to have a synchronous, hand-picked diary of your life at your fingertips. Major milestones, photographs, and even supporting words from your friends is sentimental and should make you feel good. But years down the line, are you going to be so stoked about it?

From my own experience, I think there are limitations. A few weeks ago I re-opened my Myspace account and was a bit shocked by what I found. Sure there were pictures of my trips to Europe and home that brought back great memories. But then there were comments from my exes, pics of me absolutely sloshed (that I never should have been tagged in!), and posts of me with friends I don't talk to anymore for good reasons. This brought up some strong emotions and I came to the realization that I'm not really happy that all of this is still documented in a quasi-public space online. You certainly can't change the past, but I had definitely blocked some things out (like my early 20's) and wish it wasn't all there waiting for me after I reset my password. What made it worse was knowing that these were things I posted and/or photos that I was ok with people tagging me in.

So I'm curious to see how the next generations are going to react to their Facebook-ography. Will they violate terms & conditions to assume a fake name so their parents can't tag them in nerdy shots? Will they look back on certain periods of their life and think wow-did I do that? Or will they embrace this online record compiled by family, friends, and a trendy social media platform?

Published February 3, 2014 to Instructure's blog, Keep Learning:

(http://learning.instructure.com/2014/02/top-ten-insights-into-the-wonderful-world-of-moocs/)

Top Ten Insights Into the Wonderful World of MOOCs

FEBRUARY 3, 2014  | BY WENDY LEICHT

Over the past year, I worked on the development team for MOOCs (massive open online courses) at Google, and in doing so, I learned a lot about the world of online course creation and the bright future education will have because it’s coupled with technology. (The opinions expressed in this article are my own and do not reflect the opinions of Google, Inc.) Based on my past contributions and experiences, I would like to present my top ten insights into the wonderful world of MOOCs.

1. MOOCs are experiments. Very few companies come up with a great idea and immediately start making millions of dollars (while saving the world). Give MOOCs a chance to succeed (and fail). Because they are new to education and tech, developers, professors, and even students will need time to digest the different ways that MOOCs can be experienced. Embrace the thrill of experimentation while closely analyzing the experience, the data, and the outcomes. It’s going to take time for the best system to emerge.

2. The media hype is just hype. The media loves MOOCs (because they’re so experimental). It’s easy to take one piece of data and boldly state “MOOCs are going to DISRUPT higher education!” Or “MOOCs are going to FAIL!” The truth is, it’s far too early to say whether MOOCs are going to do either of these things. Just because there were low completion rates in Udacity’s pilot partnership with San José State University does not mean the intersection of university courses and MOOCs is inherently flawed. Any number of factors may have had an effect on that experiment.

3. MOOCs will not teach you everything about a subject. Most of them are introductory by design. Taking a four-week course on art history is not going to be as comprehensive as a semester-long class. Luckily, some MOOC providers, like edX and Coursera, offer advanced classes, too.

4. Just because they’re free, doesn’t mean they’re easy.

5. MOOCs build international community. MOOCs allow you to make friends from around the world. Students often comment in the forums about how great it is to be part of an international community. And unless you are afforded the opportunity to study abroad, taking a class with such a diverse group of students could otherwise be next to impossible.

6. MOOCs offer equal opportunity discussion. Online course forums allow better opportunities for shy or less vocal students to share their opinions. And because the students are usually multinational, there is inherently less ethnocentrism and more diversity in the discussion.

7. Completion rates are not the best judges of success. As a course developer or professor, you naturally want students to succeed. But given that MOOCs represent a paradigm shift in online education, the definition of student success may not necessarily be completion rates. Before success can be defined, students’ motivations must be carefully considered. Many are curious about MOOCs, so they sign up to see what they’re all about but don’t actually participate in the class. Or students take the first module and then find themselves unable to fit the next set of videos or readings into their schedule. With each and every MOOC completed (or not), MOOC developers get a better understanding of their audience. A lot of the original tools used to measure success are shifting based on student feedback and behavior.

8. MOOCs contribute a great deal of data about human learning behaviors that can shed light on how people think and behave. Beyond the classroom, MOOCs offer insight into how people learn. This knowledge can be applied to the way online learning and instructional design is developed in the future. For example, data from MOOCs can tell you how much time students spend watching course videos. With even more careful analysis, this type of data could answer more complex questions like, “Is there an ideal course video length regardless of topic?”

9. MOOCs are a movement. They are part of a paradigm shift toward free, open learning for everyone. Society is changing, and the landscape of education has not kept up. By participating in new, innovative facets of education (like MOOCs), you can you learn new skills and help shape the future of education.

10. MOOCs are not perfect (yet). I know I said this earlier, but it’s worth repeating: MOOCs are experiments. This could be the first time a professor (or a university) has created a MOOC (or an online course). Have an open mind when you take one, expect a few grammatical mistakes, enjoy the community, and provide lots of feedback.

MOOCs may not save the world, but they’re definitely shaping the future of online education.

Technology is making us vain

Technology is making us vain and lose touch with the present. Last week, I was sitting at the beach and watched a couple stroll by. As soon as the girl passed me, she handed her boyfriend her phone and I watched her pose for no less than ten photos-- each shot was followed by her snatching the phone back from him, some intense scrutinizing, then head shaking, and then her handing him the phone back to take another, with a slightly different pose, snatch, scrutinize, repeat. Her demeanor was one that I would expect from Kim Kardashian, not a random couple on vacation walking down the beach. But alas, even halfway across the world, technology is making us vain. 

Oxford dictionary re-emphasized this with their 2013 word of the year, “selfie”. Really OXFORD? (I guess I should be happy it wasn’t “twerking” but still.) Their choice exemplifies my point. Quoting their blog, the word of the year must, “demonstrate some kind of prominence over the preceding year”. They go on to defend their selection by stating, “It seems like everyone who is anyone has posted a selfie somewhere on the Internet. If it is good enough for the Obamas or The Pope, then it is good enough for Word of the Year.” (http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2013/11/word-of-the-year-2013-winner/). (It seems that selfies may only be good enough for one of the Obamas...)

Fig.1 President Obama taking a selfie

(I think Michelle is on my side.) Just because the camera on my phone is better than my actual camera does not mean that every single "special" moment should be recorded because the phone is handy. It’s kind of sad that most people don’t take pictures anymore to share with their mom or their spouse, but instead are compelled to immediately share on a social media channel. I even caught myself having to say, “no let’s keep this picture for us, not them" (them being my 500 friends on Facebook).

Not only is technology making us vain but it hinders enjoyment of the moment. Being present is a slowly fading art. Think about the last time you went to a concert and the band played everyone's favorite song. How many people around you scrambled to find their phone and then stood there with their phone above their head, as still as they could be, recording the song? How many people were dancing? Regardless of the numbers, you tell me, who was having more fun?

While awesome in so many aspects, technology is, unfortunately, sucking the consciousness out of our lives and making us more self absorbed. Instead of savoring moments, we're recording them, so that our brains don't have to remember what we did last night. Social media capital is king. Will we eventually evolve to no longer needing our short-term or long-term brain functions because so much of our lives have been captured by a smartphone? I certainly hope not. At least for now, before you dig into your purse or pocket to find your phone, consider just enjoying the moment. Like boxes full of photographs, how many times are you really going to go back and look at your "perfect" pose on the beach or watch the ten videos you took at the concert last night? 

Tweeting: Less Annoying, More Evolved

People use social media as a tool for self-reflection and sharing, but sometimes people are overly reflective or dramatic because they're seeking attention or validation. We all have that friend who posts a new picture of her cat every day or writes status updates like "Wow such a bad day, I just want to crawl under a rock". Twitter's design is different from other types of social media because while it allows the user to share, it is also demands they be concise. The 140 character limit inherently eliminates some of the nuisances I find in social media, like over-sharing about your kid's first poop or uninformed ramblings about politics.

Fig.1 Political ramblings on Facebook

Don't get me wrong, sharing opinions, updates on your kid, and pictures of your cat do contribute to online identity construction, and helps you stay in touch with friends, but broadcasting to your worldwide fan base where you had dinner last night ultimately doesn't tell anyone much more than how much money you're willing to spend on a steak.

Twitter allows you to actively tweet, or simply consume, without having to reciprocate (and without the negative connotation of being a Facebook stalker, or, my new favorite term--an "Insta-voyeur"). The news feed allows you to quickly see what's going on without accidentally seeing the bloody chicken picture your random friend's friend reposted on behalf of PETA. You have the option of expanding the #lookathisbloodychickenlovePETA tweet, but, luckily, you're not inundated with the visual when browsing. [Note: this feature has changed a bit since date of publishing.]

Fig. 2 Live chick commentary

Also, Twitter's framework reifies the evolution of linguistics in our tech-forward culture, that is, the trend toward briefer communications. We don’t speak in long-winded sonnets or use verbose language anymore. Quite the converse is true these days, with acronyms often replacing whole phrases (ROTFL). Everything, from our attention spans to the time it takes to fly transatlantic, is becoming shorter and faster. By design, Twitter supports the evolution of language towards a concise, categorical, linguistic culture while filtering out those things that are annoying about social media.

3 Lessons Learned about MOOC Development

Over the past year, I have worked on the development team for three different MOOCS (massive open online courses) at Google (Mapping with Google, Introduction to Web Accessibility, and Advanced Power Searching). (The opinions expressed in this article are my own and do not reflect the opinions of Google, Inc.) Each MOOC was different and I learned quite a bit about online course development and instructional design. I’d like to share my top three lessons learned about MOOC development.

1. Students love recognition. Even if its just a simple pdf that says, "Congratulations!", people really like to have a tangible record of their work they can print out and hang on their refrigerator. We had a number of students sharing pictures of their certificates on our course’s Google+ community and it was great to see how excited students were about completing the course. We ensured that our instructional design focused on student recognition because there is a high correlation between positive reinforcement and academic achievement (Haydon and Musti-Rao, Diedrich). For example, in addition to earning a certificate at the end of the course, we designed our MOOC communities to be interactive so that course teaching assistants could support and cheer students on.

2. MOOCs can contribute a great deal of data about human learning behaviors that sheds light on how people think and behave. There are so many questions about how people learn that can be investigated by MOOCs and applied to online learning and instructional design. For example, how much time do students spend watching videos? Is there an ideal video length irregardless of topic? I hope that the large MOOC providers, like Udacity and Coursera, ask and answer these types of questions, given their abundance of course offerings. Edx has published one article, so far, discussing some initial data analysis from their “Circuits and Electronics” MOOC. Additionally, an instructional designer from my department at Google published an article on the Google Research blog discussing some of our findings from the first few courses we developed. Sharing knowledge gleaned about patterns of student learning will enhance the future of online education.

Fig.1 I wonder how this whole "brain" thing works

3. Keep a record of what worked and what didn't. Of course, there are things you can't learn until you experience them, but since MOOC development is a somewhat objective process, there are some elements that will stay the same. Keeping a record will help the next person understand some of the hoops that they're probably going to have to jump through and probably save some time. Document while you go, as much as you can: retrospective reflections, tips and tricks, important time frames, workflows, etc. Even if the course was a complete success there can always be improvements in the content or the processes if you’re going to host it again. And don’t forget about the students. I guarantee you they have something to say. Record your student’s feedback. Make sure you reference these notes before starting a new project.

The TRUTH About Mercury Poisoning: A Survivor's Girlfriend Reveals All

An article was published earlier this week in Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) (a peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the National Institutes of Health & various other government agencies) stating “that limiting seafood intake during pregnancy may have a limited impact on prenatal blood mercury levels”. Several media outlets took this information and ran with it, publishing articles titled, “Concerns over mercury levels in fish maybe unfounded” and “Consumption of fish may have little effect on mercury levels in pregnant women”.

These news groups are missing a crucial detail in their reports citing EHP's research: the data referenced in the study was collected twenty years. EHP analyzed data gathered by the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a study that evaluated blood samples and diets of pregnant women in the United Kingdom between 1991-1992, to see how certain lifestyle factors affected offspring. Twenty years ago, mercury levels found in fish, were far lower than what is found in our environment today. Present day, agricultural run-off and other pollutants have tainted our waterways and affected our food chain. There is much evidence to suggest that mercury levels are high in fish and even non-pregnant people should avoid eating too much fish. Though eating fish does provide nutrients that other types of food don’t provide, eating too much of the wrong type of fish could also turn you into a zombie (or make you act like one).

Fig.1 Sushi-a dinner delight or a secret killer?

I make these statements refuting the claim that concerns over mercury levels in fish are “unfounded” because I have personal experience with this topic. Earlier this year, my boyfriend, someone I eat with frequently, got mercury poisoning. He stopped eating meat, to be “healthier”, and supplemented his diet with fish (purchased at places like Whole Foods or the local fish market). All of a sudden he started feeling unwell, with symptoms like massive headaches, tinnitus (ringing in the ears), and (zombie-like) mood swings. After several rounds of doctor visits and every sort of test possible, a simple blood test revealed high levels of mercury. A "normal" mercury level is less than 10 and his were in the mid-20s. If mercury poisoning had such a major affect on the health of a hyper-fit yoga instructor, I can’t imagine how it could affect pregnant women.

So the burning questions... How much fish can I eat before I start acting like a zombie? And do certain fish have higher levels of mercury than others? The quantity and frequency of fish that is safe to consume depends upon species, location, and fish size. Ahi tuna, one of the main species of fish found on restaurant menus and grocer’s ice beds, has one of the highest levels of mercury. (http://www.nrdc.org/health/effects/mercury/sources.asp)

Fig.2 List of fish with high levels of mercury from the Monterey Bay Aquarium

A number of seafood watch agencies, aquariums, and natural resource agencies measure mercury levels in fish and publish reports detailing which fish are ok to eat and in what quantities. Two good resources are:

1. Monterey Bay Aquarium’s website—you can even print out pocket guides or get an app for your phone. (http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/sfw_recommendations.aspx)
2. Office of environmental health hazard assessment—you can search levels of mercury in fish by location, so if you fish or like to buy locally-sourced fish, this is a great resource. (http://www.oehha.ca.gov/fish.html)

Mercury poisoning is a very real health threat. Be diligent when choosing fish to cook or eat. And if you tend to eat a lot of sushi or if fish is your main source of protein, get your mercury levels tested.